Hello.
Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:20:56PM +0900, Kentaro Takeda wrote:
In the LSM ml, we are discussing about
how to know requested pathnames within LSM modules.
Currently, VFS helper functions don't pass struct vfsmount parameter.
Therefore, we cannot calculate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Morton wrote:
| On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:11:37 -0800 Andrew G. Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| [This patch represents a no-op unless CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES
| is enabled at configure time.]
|
| Patches like this scare the pants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Quoting Andrew G. Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Here is the patch to add per-process securebits.
|
| Its all code that lives inside the capability LSM and the new
At Sunday 03 February 2008 around 08:18:12 Andrew Morton wrote:
So how do we ever get to the stage where we can recommend that distributors
turn these things on, and have them agree with us?
FWIW with my distributor hat on I think File system capabilities are very nice
and enables one to ship
