Re: [PATCH] af_unix: introduce unix_sk_const helper

2015-10-08 Thread David Miller
From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 22:52:46 +0200 > Commit 124613012db1 ("af_unix: Convert the unix_sk macro to an inline > function for type safety") was recently added to catch incorrect > uses of the unix_sk helper using compiler warnings. > > It has now caught one such case in lsm_au

Re: [RFC] Allow LSM to use IP address/port number.

2007-07-09 Thread David Miller
From: Tetsuo Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:33:01 +0900 > @@ -649,8 +660,16 @@ int sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, st > init_sync_kiocb(&iocb, NULL); > iocb.private = &siocb; > ret = __sock_recvmsg(&iocb, sock, msg, size, flags); > - if (-EIOCBQUEUED ==

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

2007-06-27 Thread David Miller
From: Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT) > --- David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Neither of those are reasons why something should go into the tree. > > They reflect the corporate reality of the open source c

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

2007-06-27 Thread David Miller
From: Crispin Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:46:57 -0700 > But we do not want to prevent other people from using SELinux if it > suits them. Linux is about choice, and that is especially vital in > security. As Linus himself observed when LSM was started, there are a > lot of