Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-21 Thread Kevin Winchester
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:10:51 -0600 > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:25:27 -0800 Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b49

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:10:51 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:25:27 -0800 Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > > > agains

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-21 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:25:27 -0800 Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > > against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and > > Andy - ultimately, the

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:25:18 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:25:27 -0800 Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > > against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Ke

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:25:27 -0800 Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and > Andy - ultimately, the legacy support wasn't transparent. In particular, >

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-19 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Andrew Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrew, > > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and > Andy - ultimately, the legacy support wasn'

Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-18 Thread Kevin Winchester
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Morgan wrote: > Andrew, > > The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies > against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and > Andy - ultimately, the legacy support wasn't transparent. In particular

[PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

2007-11-17 Thread Andrew Morgan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew, The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and Andy - ultimately, the legacy support wasn't transparent. In particular, userspace 32-bit capability m