On 12/10/2018 22:40, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 3:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernande
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> I wonder whether it makes sense to expose to userspace somehow whether
>> mremap is "fast" for a particular architecture. If a feature relies on
>> fast mremap, it might b
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> I wonder whether it makes sense to expose to userspace somehow whether
> mremap is "fast" for a particular architecture. If a feature relies on
> fast mremap, it might be better for some userland component to disable
> that featur
I wonder whether it makes sense to expose to userspace somehow whether
mremap is "fast" for a particular architecture. If a feature relies on
fast mremap, it might be better for some userland component to disable
that feature entirely rather than blindly use mremap and end up
performing very poorly
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:39:45PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Not 32-bit ARM?
Well, I didn't want to enable every possible architecture we could in a
single go. Certainly arm32 can be a follow on enablement as can be other
architectures. The point of this series is to upstream this feature
Not 32-bit ARM?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:18:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joel Fernandes
> [...]
>> > Also, do we not flush the caches from any path when we munmap
>> > address space? We do call do_munmap on the old mapping f
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:18:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joel Fernandes
[...]
> > Also, do we not flush the caches from any path when we munmap
> > address space? We do call do_munmap on the old mapping from mremap
> > after moving to the new one.
>
> Sparc makes sure that shared ma
This series speeds up mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at the
PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra
'address' argument that mremap passes to pte_alloc may do something
subtle architecture related in the future that may make the scheme not
work. Also we find th
Moving page-tables at the PMD-level on x86 is known to be safe. Enable
this option so that we can do fast mremap when possible.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 1a0be022f91d..
Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
not enabled. The bottleneck is move_page_tables, which is copying each
pte at a time, and can be really slow across a large map. Turning on THP
may not be
Moving page-tables at the PMD-level on arm64 is known to be safe. Enable
this option so that we can do fast mremap when possible.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 1b1a0e
Hi,
Here is the latest "fast mremap" series. The main change in this submission is
to enable the fast mremap optimization on a per-architecture basis to prevent
possible issues with architectures that may not behave well with such change.
x86: select HAVE_MOVE_PMD for faster mremap (v1)
arm64: se
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> On 10/12/18 3:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > > > On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > > An
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 09:57:19AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:19:46PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:50:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 11,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:51:45PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The changes were obtained by applying the following Coccinelle script.
>
> A bit of clarification happened for its implementation details.
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2018-October/005374.html
>
> I have taken als
On 10/11/2018 08:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 05:03:50PM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 09/26/2018 04:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> There are generally two cases:
>>>
>>> 1) either the platform has an efficient flush_tlb_range() and
>>> asm-generic/tlb.h doesn't
> The changes were obtained by applying the following Coccinelle script.
A bit of clarification happened for its implementation details.
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2018-October/005374.html
I have taken also another look at the following SmPL code.
> identifier fn =~
> "^(__pte_allo
From: Joel Fernandes
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:50:46 -0700
> If its an issue, then how do transparent huge pages work on Sparc? I don't
> see the huge page code (move_huge_pages) during mremap doing anything special
> for Sparc architecture when moving PMDs..
This is because all huge pages are
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:30:56 +0300
> I looked into the code more and noticed move_pte() helper called from
> move_ptes(). It changes PTE entry to suite new address.
>
> It is only defined in non-trivial way on Sparc. I don't know much about
> Sparc and it's hard for
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:58:40PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
[...]
> > > > > > If I read the code right, MIPS completely ignores the address
> > > > > > argument so
> > > > > > set_pmd_at there may not have the effect which this patch is trying
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > achieve.
> > > > > Ignori
On 10/12/18 5:50 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 3:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:19:46PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:50:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > Androi
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> On 10/12/18 3:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > > > On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > > An
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:38:57PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > I wrote something like this as below but it failed to compile, Julia any
> > suggestions on how to express this?
> >
> > @pte_alloc_func_proto depends on patch exists@
> > type T1, T2, T3, T4;
> > identifier fn =~
> > "^(__pte_alloc|
On 10/12/18 3:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory
management
related operations
> I wrote something like this as below but it failed to compile, Julia any
> suggestions on how to express this?
>
> @pte_alloc_func_proto depends on patch exists@
> type T1, T2, T3, T4;
> identifier fn =~
> "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
> @@
>
>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:09:06PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> > b/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> > index 12fe700632f4..4399d712f6db 100644
> > --- a/arch/m
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This series speeds up mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at the
> > PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra
> > 'address' argument that mremap
On 12/10/2018 15:37, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> > related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
> > not enabled. The bottlenec
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
not enabled. The bottleneck is move_page_tables, which is copying each
pte at a time, and can be rea
On 10/12/18 2:37 AM, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
This series speeds up mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at the
PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra
'address' argument that mremap passes to pte_alloc may do something
subtle architecture related in the fu
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:50:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> > > rel
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> > related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
> >
Hi Eugeniy,
thank you for the update.
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 19:28 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> As for today HSDK reset driver implements only
> .reset() callback.
>
> In case of driver which implements one of standard
> reset controller usage pattern
> (call *_deassert() in probe(), call *_as
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > @@ -239,7 +287,21 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct
> > *vma,
> > split_huge_pmd(vma, old_pmd, old_addr);
> >
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
> not enabled. The bottleneck is move_page_tables, which is copying each
> pt
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> b/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> index 12fe700632f4..4399d712f6db 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgalloc.h
> @@
38 matches
Mail list logo
