Mike Rapoport writes:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
>
> Every architecture that supports FLATMEM memory model defines its own
> version of pfn_valid() that essentially compares a pfn to max_mapnr.
>
> Use mips/powerpc version implemented as static inline as a generic
> implementation of
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
Every architecture that supports FLATMEM memory model defines its own
version of pfn_valid() that essentially compares a pfn to max_mapnr.
Use mips/powerpc version implemented as static inline as a generic
implementation of pfn_valid() and drop its per-architecture
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
There is stale definition of pfn_valid() for DISCONTINGMEM memory model
guarded !FLATMEM && !SPARSEMEM && NUMA ifdefery.
Remove everything but definition of pfn_valid() for FLATMEM.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM)
---
arch/mips/include/asm/page.h | 15
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
The MMU variant uses generic definitions of page_to_pfn() and
pfn_to_page(), but !MMU defines them in include/asm/page_no.h for no
good reason.
Include asm-generic/memory_model.h in the common include/asm/page.h and
drop redundant definitions.
Signed-off-by: Mike
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
Makes it consistent with other architectures and allows for generic
definition of pfn_valid() in asm-generic/memory_model.h with clear override
in arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM)
---
arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 2 --
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
Hi,
Every architecture that supports FLATMEM memory model defines its own
version of pfn_valid() that essentially compares a pfn to max_mapnr.
Use mips/powerpc version implemented as static inline as a generic
implementation of pfn_valid() and drop its
