[PATCH] arc: [devboards] Add support of NFSv3 ACL

2018-11-20 Thread Alexey Brodkin
By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists) which might be quite convenient to have so that mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system. In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless. This among other thigs fixes Glibc's "nptl/tst-umask1". Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] arc: [devboards] Add support of NFSv3 ACL

2018-11-21 Thread Sasha Levin
Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.2, v4.18.19, v4.14.81, v4.9.137, v4.4.163, v3.18.125. v4.19.2: Build OK! v4.

Re: [PATCH] arc: [devboards] Add support of NFSv3 ACL

2018-11-21 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 11/20/18 2:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists) > which might be quite convenient to have so that > mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system. > > In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless. > This among other t

RE: [PATCH] arc: [devboards] Add support of NFSv3 ACL

2018-11-21 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hi Vineet, > -Original Message- > From: Vineet Gupta > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:40 PM > To: Alexey Brodkin ; linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Cupertino Miranda ; > sta...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: [d

Re: [PATCH] arc: [devboards] Add support of NFSv3 ACL

2018-11-21 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 11/20/18 2:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists) > which might be quite convenient to have so that > mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system. > > In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless. > This among other t