On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 15:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > > @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 15:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > + * @only_quirks_used: Only read quirks (like "is_private" or
> > > >
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > + * @only_quirks_used: Only read quirks (like "is_private" or
> > > "is_memcpy") from
> > > + * platform data structure. Read other parameters from
> > > device
> > >
Hi Andy,
Could you possibly tell me your ideas about these changes?
Thanks.
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 18:59 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> This series is to address a proposal by Andy in these threads:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
>
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 18:59 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> This series is to address a proposal by Andy in these threads:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11541.html
> Split platform data to actual hardware properties, and platform