On 05/06/2020 01:44, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 5/29/20 4:50 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
Although this code follow other architectures, I think it woudl be better
to move forward a macro that emulates function calls and use proper
static inline function instead for _FPU_*
On 5/29/20 4:50 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> Although this code follow other architectures, I think it woudl be better
>>> to move forward a macro that emulates function calls and use proper
>>> static inline function instead for _FPU_* (as for get-rounding-mode.h).
>> OK. do you have
On 02/06/2020 15:13, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
>> Thi s approach seems to trip math/check-installed-headers.out
>>
>>
>> -std=c89
>> In file included from ../include/fpu_control.h:2,
>> from /tmp/cih_test_Nknxdp.c:8:
>> ../sysdeps/arc/fp
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Thi s approach seems to trip math/check-installed-headers.out
>
>
> -std=c89
> In file included from ../include/fpu_control.h:2,
> from /tmp/cih_test_Nknxdp.c:8:
> ../sysdeps/arc/fpu_control.h:82:14: error: expected ';' before 'unsign
On Fri, 29 May 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Something like below ?
>
> +# define _FPU_FPSR_FWE 0x8000
> +
> -# define _FPU_GETCW(cw) __asm__ volatile ("lr %0, [0x300]" : "=r" (cw))
> -# define _FPU_SETCW(cw) __asm__ volatile ("sr %0, [0x300]" : : "r" (cw))
> +sta
On Fri, 29 May 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Side question: what do s_ / e_ prefixes mean?
> The suffix is clear s_roundf (float), s_round (double), s_roundl (128).
I don't know what they stand for (the naming convention probably
originates from fdlibm, or at least much of the code
On 5/29/20 3:28 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> +/* Macros for accessing the hardware control word. */
>>> +# define _FPU_GETCW(cw) __asm__ volatile ("lr %0, [0x300]" : "=r" (cw))
>>> +# define _FPU_SETCW(cw) __asm__ volatile ("sr %0, [0x300]" : : "r" (cw))
>>> +
>>> +/* Macros for a
On 5/29/20 7:12 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 22/04/2020 22:41, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrt.c b/sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrt.c
>> +
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +
>> +double
>> +__ieee754_sqrt (double d)
>> +{
>>
On 22/04/2020 22:41, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
As prior patch we do not use DCO, but rather copyright assignment.
Some comments below.
> ---
> sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrt.c| 27
> sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrtf.c | 27
> sysdeps/a
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
---
sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrt.c| 27
sysdeps/arc/fpu/e_sqrtf.c | 27
sysdeps/arc/fpu/fclrexcpt.c | 36 +++
sysdeps/arc/fpu/fegetenv.c | 37 +++
sysdeps/arc/fpu/fegetmode.c | 31 ++
sysdeps/arc/fpu/f
10 matches
Mail list logo
