On 12/20/18 3:24 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/18 2:17 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> I should note a separate issue to consider: that of *static* PIE support.
>>> That doesn't need to be working, but if it's not working,
>>
>> Aren't there
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 12/19/18 2:17 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > I should note a separate issue to consider: that of *static* PIE support.
> > That doesn't need to be working, but if it's not working,
>
> Aren't there directed test cases for that already ?
>
> PASS:
On 12/19/18 2:17 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I should note a separate issue to consider: that of *static* PIE support.
> That doesn't need to be working, but if it's not working,
Aren't there directed test cases for that already ?
PASS: elf/tst-tls1-static
PASS: elf/tst-tls1-static-non-pie
FAIL:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Indeed with current glibc port, we do build/test/run a bunch of packages
> relying on PIE (dumpcap, openssh come to mind) successfully. So yes PIE
> should work in general for ARC now. FWIW this could also explain the
> following current results.
I
On 12/18/18 3:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> +libc {
>> + GLIBC_2.29 {
>> +__adddf3; __addsf3; __divdf3; __divsf3; __eqdf2; __eqsf2; __extendsfdf2;
>> +__fixdfdi; __fixdfsi; __fixsfdi; __fixsfsi;
>> +__fixunsdfdi; __fixunsdfsi;
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> +libc {
> + GLIBC_2.29 {
> +__adddf3; __addsf3; __divdf3; __divsf3; __eqdf2; __eqsf2; __extendsfdf2;
> +__fixdfdi; __fixdfsi; __fixsfdi; __fixsfsi;
> +__fixunsdfdi; __fixunsdfsi; __fixunssfdi; __fixunssfsi;
> +__floatdidf; __floatdisf;
