Hi,
On 03/21/2014 09:14 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
Hijacking your post here,
have you seen the 2GiB support patch? Any thoughts on how to proceed with
that one? Upstream atleast listens to you now ;)
2GiB seems to just work upstream, despite them still using signed longs
for this.
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 07:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ian Campbell,
In message 1395438866-1193-4-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk you wrote:
This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. These
changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 10:04 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Sorry, this is a NAK for these patches.
These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make
the patch sizes more manageable. This is not how we work. Patches
have to implement specific features, or fix specific
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 20:11 -0300, Emilio López wrote:
Hi Ian,
El vie 21 mar 2014 18:40:04 ART, Ian Campbell escribió:
As advised by Tom.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
---
include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
As advised by Tom.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
---
v2: Simplify (and make correct) the comment
---
include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/sunxi-common.h
I am trying to get an interrupt input to but I get an error when I try to
set PC19 as an interrupt input.
According to the datasheet on page 243 it can be EINT12 but elsewhere in
the doc, EINT12 is shown for PH12.
It looks like the document is wrong.
--
You received this message because you
Dear Ian Campbell,
In message 1395438845.2234.95.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote:
This is my second cut at an upstreamable series based upon the
https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi.git#sunxi tree. The
intention is to present a minimal starting point for upstreaming to
which
Dear Ian,
In message 1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote:
What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines?
I explained the process by which I arrived at these lists in 0/9. It
means that they appear as an author for a commit in the history in the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:04:50AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:43:43PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
This dtsi describes the axp209 PMIC, and is to be included from inside
the i2c controller node to which the axp209 is connected.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 16:12 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 01:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ian,
In message 1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote:
What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines?
I explained the process by
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Hans de Goede,
In message 532d5238.6080...@redhat.com you wrote:
These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make
the patch sizes more manageable. This is not how we work. Patches
have to implement
Hi,
On 03/18/2014 11:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 00:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
There is no way to reset the cpu, so use the watchdog for this.
Did you see
https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg134259.html ?
Ah no, but I've read it now.
I think it
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 11:13 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
As advised by Tom.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
Thanks, I've pushed this to the u-boot-sunxi.git sunxi branch.
Regards,
Hans
---
v2: Simplify (and make correct) the comment
---
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 17:16 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/18/2014 11:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 00:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
There is no way to reset the cpu, so use the watchdog for this.
Did you see
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:59:19PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
+ of_id = of_match_device(axp20x_of_match, i2c-dev);
+ if (!of_id) {
+ dev_err(i2c-dev, Unable to setup AXP20X data\n);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:13:36PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:59:19PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
+ of_id =
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:42:01AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:13:36PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at
Dear Hans de Goede,
In message 532da872.5000...@redhat.com you wrote:
No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by
for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear
GPLv2+ license headers on each and every file.
Can the code be properly
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 08:31 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Hans de Goede,
In message 532da872.5000...@redhat.com you wrote:
No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by
for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear
GPLv2+ license headers on each
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:59:19PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
+ of_id = of_match_device(axp20x_of_match, i2c-dev);
+ if (!of_id) {
+ dev_err(i2c-dev,
20 matches
Mail list logo
