[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] sunxi: initial sun7i clocks and timer support.

2014-03-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Olliver Schinagl, In message <5330b4c9.10...@schinagl.nl> you wrote: > > > sr32() is not defined anywhere. > it should be defined in > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/sys_proto.h > and comes from > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/syslib.c Please avoid using sr32() alltogether. It is basically only used

[linux-sunxi] Re: A10-meminfo: DRAMC settings dump utility

2014-03-24 Thread ratin
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 1:16:28 PM UTC-8, Max wrote: > Hi, > > > > I experimented a bit with dumping the A10 memory settings using /dev/mem > > under Linux/Android, and that seems to work. > > At least on my Cubieboard 1 GB and Hackberry 512 MB. > > > > I was wondering if someone with

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] sunxi: initial sun7i clocks and timer support.

2014-03-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Monday, March 24, 2014 at 11:42:17 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > On 03/24/2014 09:52 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:18 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. > >> These changes are not useful by themselves b

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] sunxi: initial sun7i clocks and timer support.

2014-03-24 Thread Olliver Schinagl
On 03/24/2014 09:52 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:18 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. [...] +int clock_i

[linux-sunxi] Re: A10 versus A20 versus A20 , gtkperf result.

2014-03-24 Thread Rajesh Mallah
I also observed that a clone of the rootfs from Mele M3 to another A20 based TB Box consistently performed slower than Mele M3. MeleM3 :18.95 secs Other A20: 25 secs the dump from a10-meminfo-static were same in both the cases except for dram_zq param Can anyone pls explain why the dif

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] clk: sunxi: Remove calls to clk_put

2014-03-24 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-03-13 08:14:13) > Callers of clk_put must disable the clock first. This also means that as long > as the clock is enabled the driver should hold a reference to that clock. > Hence, the call to clk_put here are bogus and should be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripar

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/9] sunxi: initial sun7i pinmux and gpio support

2014-03-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:19 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/pinmux.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/pinmux.c new file mode 100644 > index 000..8f5cbfe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/pinmux.c > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ > +/* > + * (C) Copy

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/9] sunxi: mmc support

2014-03-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:25 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > As well as the following signed-off-by the sunxi branch shows commits to > these files authored by the following: > Stefan Roese > Tom Cubie > yemao > > Signed-off-by: Henrik Nordstrom > Signed-off-by: Luke Leighton > Signed-o

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/9] sunxi: initial sun7i clocks and timer support.

2014-03-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:18 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. These > changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch > sizes more manageable. [...] > +int clock_init(void) > +{ > + struct sunxi_ccm

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-24 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:22 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting > via FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out > to make the patch sizes more manageable. > > As well as the following signed-off

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Build sunxi-next for A20

2014-03-24 Thread Olliver Schinagl
On 03/24/2014 01:55 PM, i...@integrazioneweb.com wrote: Hi Olliver, i tryed some defconfig but i haven't uart cable so i don't know where is boot problem. Then it will be next to impossible to debug. Olliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux

Re: [linux-sunxi] uboot for Mele M3 A20

2014-03-24 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:31:56AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > On 03/23/2014 06:27 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I regularly search Alibaba market place for devices (TV boxes) can be >> reused as low powered general purpose computers. Many of such devices >> have debug >> ports ( some

[linux-sunxi] Re: A31 pmic (axp221) support

2014-03-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/24/2014 03:06 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:00:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > There's still some subtleties I don't get yet, but the more I > think about this, the more I feel like we'l

[linux-sunxi] Re: A31 pmic (axp221) support

2014-03-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, p.s. I've taken a quick look at the mmc code we've for the A31 in the sunxi provided kernel sources and it seems 100% identical to the mmc controller in sun5i and sun7i. I've not yet gotten around to actually hooking things up in devicetree and given it a shot though. My rough plan for movin

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] clk: sunxi: factors: automatic reparenting support

2014-03-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:39:45PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2014-02-18 06:05:16) > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:02:15AM +0100, David Lanzendörfer wrote: > > > From: Emilio López > > > > > > This commit implements .determine_rate, so that our factor clocks can be > > >

Re: [linux-sunxi] [A20] sunxi framebuffer overlay help needed

2014-03-24 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:00:39AM -0700, Ivan Kozic wrote: > Hi all, > > Up to now, I have successfully debugged and fixed CSI issues in 3.4 kernel > so that it works more-less closer to the spec of sun7i (driver is only > sun4i compatible by default - for more advanced features, you'll need so

[linux-sunxi] Re: A31 pmic (axp221) support

2014-03-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:00:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> There's still some subtleties I don't get yet, but the more I > >>> think about this, the more I feel like we'll have to write our own > >>> bus :( > >> > >> So on

[linux-sunxi] [A20] sunxi framebuffer overlay help needed

2014-03-24 Thread Ivan Kozic
Hi all, Up to now, I have successfully debugged and fixed CSI issues in 3.4 kernel so that it works more-less closer to the spec of sun7i (driver is only sun4i compatible by default - for more advanced features, you'll need some changes in the code). For more info, you can visit: https://group

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Build sunxi-next for A20

2014-03-24 Thread info
Hi Olliver, i tryed some defconfig but i haven't uart cable so i don't know where is boot problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+u

[linux-sunxi] Re: sunxi-3.4 usb and rtl8188 regressions.

2014-03-24 Thread Drona Nagarajan
Hi, I'm facing the same issues. After adding the usb_wifi_para section, my wifi still refuses to work. I'm able to modprobe the module but nothing after that. "wlan0" is not being detected! On Friday, January 3, 2014 5:30:48 PM UTC+5:30, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > Hi, > > I have just brought up

Re: [linux-sunxi] uboot for Mele M3 A20

2014-03-24 Thread Olliver Schinagl
On 03/23/2014 06:27 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: Hi, I regularly search Alibaba market place for devices (TV boxes) can be reused as low powered general purpose computers. Many of such devices have debug ports ( some do not have also ). Most allwinner based devices on marketplace are A20 based, 1 G

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi.git] sunxi: dram: checkpatch.pl cleanups

2014-03-24 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 12:55 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 03/23/2014 04:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wr

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi.git] sunxi: dram: checkpatch.pl cleanups

2014-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 12:55 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 03/23/2014 04:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> One thing that stands out when doing a diff against

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mfd: AXP20x: Add mfd driver for AXP20x PMIC

2014-03-24 Thread Lee Jones
> > > +static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = { > > > + { > > > + .name = "axp20x-pek", > > > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources), > > > + .resources = axp20x_pek_resources, > > > + }, { > > > + .name = "axp20x-regulator", >

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/9] sunxi: only try to init dram once.

2014-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 00:21 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote: > sön 2014-03-16 klockan 17:34 + skrev Ian Campbell: > > As Alex explains in [0] this triple call likely dates back to before the > > DRAM > > init code used proper timings. It is not necessary any more. > > maybe, but not comfortable

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH+GIT 0/9] sunxi: upstream review based cleanups

2014-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 00:00 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote: > sön 2014-03-16 klockan 19:40 +0100 skrev Hans de Goede: > > > Thanks I've added the 9 patches to the u-boot-sunxi repo sunxi branch, > > as for the merge with v2014.04-rc2, I would like to wait what HNO has > > to say about that. > > Me

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH u-boot-sunxi.git] sunxi: dram: checkpatch.pl cleanups

2014-03-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/24/2014 12:04 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > fre 2014-03-21 klockan 16:33 + skrev Ian Campbell: > >> Thanks, I was really hoping we could pull mainline up to this level too >> ASAP. I want to avoid the possibility of diverging into two forks with >> different featuresets. But I guess

[linux-sunxi] GPIO EINT driver showing gpio_irq_hdl: handler failed

2014-03-24 Thread Dave McLaughlin
I've ported a touch driver to my system and each time the interrupt handler fires I am seeing this in the debug output. gpio_irq_hdl: handler failed I've checked the handler and it is passing back IRQ_HANDLED to this function so it appears to be a bug in the code here. if (pdev_id->handler