[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3.4 1/1] Backport of kernel 4.2 driver for DesignWare UART.

Hi, The problem I had was when copying and pasting the contents of the patch into a file from the google groups website. The patch failed. I found the option to "show the original message" and it worked perfectly. Thanks a lot, Francisco. El sábado, 21 de enero de 2017, 17:19:16 (UTC-3),

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 02/12] sunxi: simplify ACTLR.SMP bit set #ifdef

Hi, On 16/01/17 07:44, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 08:28:07AM +, André Przywara wrote: >> On 13/01/17 08:09, Vishnu Patekar wrote: >> Hi Vishnu, >> >>> Even for the single core cortex-a7, SMP bit should be set before >>> enabling MMU and cache. >>> >>> Reference: Cortex A7

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 09/12] sunxi: H5: add COUNTER_FREQUENCY

Hi, On 16/01/17 08:01, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 01:30:01AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: >> For the arch timer to work properly, we need to setup the CNTFRQ >> register, which is only possible in EL3. >> Define the arch timer frequency in sun8i.h as well, so that ARMv8's >>

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 08/12] sunxi: prepare for sharing MACH_SUN8I_H3 config symbol

On 16/01/17 07:59, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 01:30:00AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The Allwinner H5 is very close to the H3 SoC, but has ARMv8 cores. >> To allow sharing the clocks, GPIO and driver code easily, create an >> architecture agnostic MACH_SUN8I_H3_H5 Kconfig

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3.4 1/1] Backport of kernel 4.2 driver for DesignWare UART.

On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 10:08:41 PM UTC+1, Francisco Larramendi wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to use this patch in a project. > Where can I get this patch from in a form I can use? > > Regards > Francisco Larramendi > > Just save the contents of the post into .patch file and apply with patch

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: MMC regression on 4.10

On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 18:06 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:48:46AM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: > > > > > > After cherry-picking and fixing the conflicts, it seems to > > > > > > fix > > > > > > booting > > > > > > from the sdcard on 4.10-rc (or current mainline master). > >

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: MMC regression on 4.10

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:48:46AM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: > > > > > After cherry-picking and fixing the conflicts, it seems to fix > > > > > booting > > > > > from the sdcard on 4.10-rc (or current mainline master). > > > > > > > > This will severely conflict with what arm-soc already have > >

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: AXP806: Fix dcdcb being set instead of dcdce

A typo or copy-paste bug means that the register access intended for regulator dcdce goes to dcdcb instead. This patch corrects it. Signed-off-by: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Fixes: 2ca342d391e3 (regulator: axp20x: Support AXP806 variant) --- I have a board where dcdcb powers

[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] sunxi: SPL: add FIT config selector for Pine64 boards

On 21/01/17 04:05, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: Hi Siarhei, thanks for your comments! > On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 21:55:53 + > André Przywara wrote: > >> On 20/01/17 21:35, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> >> Hi Maxime, >> >> thanks for having a look! >> >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at

[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 05/11] tools: mksunxiboot: allow larger SPL binaries

On 21/01/17 04:24, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: Hi Siarhei, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 01:53:25 + > Andre Przywara wrote: > >> mksunxiboot limits the size of the resulting SPL binaries to pretty >> conservative values to cover all SoCs and all boot media (NAND). >> In