=
> {
> .driver = {
> .name = "sun4i-drm",
> .of_match_table = sun4i_drv_of_table,
> + .pm = _drv_drm_pm_ops,
> },
> };
> module_platform_driver(sun4i_drv_platform_driver);
> --
> 2.23.0
>
-3.dts| 5
> .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi.dtsi | 5
> .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts | 5 ++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi | 14 ++
> 6 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Daniel V
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:24:19AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:57:37AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 05:22:58PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:59:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 05:22:58PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:59:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:23:59AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:13:55AM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> >
instead of trying to auto-match against a DT compatible string and load a
panel driver which is almost all fake.
Or we teach dp_aux to register itself and somehow teach panel-edp how it
can get hold of the dp_aux channel it needs.
But fake mode in panel-simple sounds like the wrong approach. A
> + .prepare_fb = drm_gem_fb_prepare_fb,
> .atomic_check = sun8i_vi_layer_atomic_check,
> .atomic_disable = sun8i_vi_layer_atomic_disable,
> .atomic_update = sun8i_vi_layer_atomic_update,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> > return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
> >
> > - if (rounded_rate > rate)
> > + if (rounded_rate > rate * 21 / 20)
> > return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clock rate OK\n");
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laure
re" at all. So yeah, Paul's idea doesn't seem entirely out of
hand to me, and for the "bug regressions" we need a concrete example
of what will break. Since we're fine-tuning the drm api all the time,
within the limits of what userspace expects :-)
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
S
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void sun4i_framebuffer_free(struct drm_device *drm)
> --
> 2.18.0
>
> _______
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
ply the H3/5
> > part of this patchset?
>
> This came a bit late, we're too close from the merge window
> now. Please resend them after -rc1 is out.
Just dropping here that drm-misc is open all the time, making for a much
better process for contributors :-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
S
regmap: add iopoll-like polling macro for regmap_field
>
> include/linux/regmap.h | 39 +++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> ht
hould have
>>
>> Fixes: 9026e0d122ac ("drm: Add Allwinner A10 Display Engine support")
>>
>> Otherwise,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>
>
> And it should be sent to stable too.
>
> Can you resend it?
Fyi but patchwork aut
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 08:44:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > +static int de2_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *drm;
> > + struct priv *priv;
> &g
v, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out2;
> +
> + /* start the subdevices */
> + ret = component_bind_all(dev, drm);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out2;
> +
> + ret = drm_dev_register(drm, 0);
This needs to be the very last step in y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Friday 15 January 2016 11:17:30 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:13:05AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:2
dev->mode_config.num_crtc,
> >dev->mode_config.num_connector);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c index 876cad58b1f9..24be31d69701
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ti
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:14:12PM -0800, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your review!
Back from vacation, sorry for the delay.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > +static void sun4i_crtc_disab
e mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_framebuffer.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_framebuffer.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:20:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The Allwinner A10 and subsequent SoCs share the same display pipeline, with
> variations in the number of controllers (1 or 2), or the presence or not of
> some output (HDMI, TV, VGA) or not.
>
> This hardware supports 4 layers and
20 matches
Mail list logo
