Hi Maxime,
Maxime Ripard schrieb am 03.08.2015 11:34:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less power
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:35:51AM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
boards
(or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:37:51AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
Hi Julian,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 01:35:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
boards
(or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise
the
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Maxime Ripard
maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
Hi again,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
0.9v
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:03:52AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
Hi again,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less power efficient in
the almost-idle case? And are
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 02:22:13PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
Is the code that uses this smart enough to sensibly switch between two
operating points with the same frequency and different voltages? If
so, maybe just add a 144MHz @ 1.0v operating point?
You could try. Though I really
Hi again,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 06:22:
My only real objection here is are there boards that can go down to
0.9v and if so, won't this change make them less power efficient in
the almost-idle case? And are those power savings enough to justify
not accepting this patch?
It will
Hi Julian,
Julian Calaby schrieb am 03.08.2015 01:35:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
boards
(or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise
the
voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can actually use
Hi Chen-Yu,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby julian.cal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Julian Calaby julian.cal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chen-Yu,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby julian.cal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20 boards
(or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the
voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can actually use
it.
Signed-off-by: Timo Sigurdsson
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
boards
(or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the
voltage for the lowest operating point
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Julian Calaby julian.cal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Timo,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
boards
(or all?), however, do not allow
13 matches
Mail list logo
