Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-26 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > That's not true anymore. And while it's true that it reduces the > amount of maintainance on the kernel side and more on the DT side. And > from what you're constantly saying, the thing we can't plan on

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-19 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:44:37AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 16/01/17 16:31, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:16:00AM +, André Przywara wrote: > >> On 05/01/17 22:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-19 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:11:49PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 19.01.2017, 17:23, "Linus Walleij" : > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Andre Przywara > > wrote: > > > >>  Any future SoCs could then just use that compatible and would describe

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-19 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Any future SoCs could then just use that compatible and would describe > the SoC details in the DT, like it's meant to be and like we do already, > but extended by putting the mux value in there as well. > So the

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-18 Thread Andre Przywara
Hi, On 16/01/17 16:31, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:16:00AM +, André Przywara wrote: >> On 05/01/17 22:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-16 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:16:00AM +, André Przywara wrote: > On 05/01/17 22:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara > >> wrote: > >> > >>> So while this patch

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-08 Thread André Przywara
On 05/01/17 22:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara >> wrote: >> >>> So while this patch technically looks correct, I was wondering if we >>> should really explore the

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2017-01-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara > wrote: > > > So while this patch technically looks correct, I was wondering if we > > should really explore the possibility of making the whole of sunxi > >

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2016-12-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara wrote: > So while this patch technically looks correct, I was wondering if we > should really explore the possibility of making the whole of sunxi > pinctrl DT controlled. > I brought this up a while ago, but people weren't

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pinctrl: add driver for Allwinner H5 SoC

2016-12-26 Thread André Przywara
Hi, On 23/12/16 12:50, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > Based on the Allwinner H5 datasheet and the pinctrl driver of the > backward-compatible H3 this introduces the pin multiplex assignments for > the H5 SoC. > > H5 introduced some more pin functions (e.g. three more groups of TS > pins, and one more