Hi,
On 03/24/2014 12:04 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
fre 2014-03-21 klockan 16:33 + skrev Ian Campbell:
Thanks, I was really hoping we could pull mainline up to this level too
ASAP. I want to avoid the possibility of diverging into two forks with
different featuresets. But I guess hno
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 12:55 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 03/23/2014 04:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
One thing that stands out when doing a diff
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 12:55 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 03/23/2014 04:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
One thing that stands out when doing a diff against sunxi-merge-v2014.04-rc2
is this:
--- u-boot/drivers/net/designware.c 2014-03-21 16:26:42.229522420 +0100
+++ u-boot-sunxi/drivers/net/designware.c 2014-03-22
fre 2014-03-21 klockan 16:33 + skrev Ian Campbell:
Thanks, I was really hoping we could pull mainline up to this level too
ASAP. I want to avoid the possibility of diverging into two forks with
different featuresets. But I guess hno isn't around so this will have to
do.
What is held back
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 03/23/2014 04:13 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 20:22 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
One thing that stands out when doing a diff against sunxi-merge-v2014.04-rc2
is this:
---
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
while(POKE THE HARDWARE);
which obscures the potentially infinite loop, I've rewritten as:
while(POKE THE HARDWARE)
;
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
while(POKE THE HARDWARE);
which obscures the potentially infinite loop, I've rewritten as:
while(POKE THE
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 04:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
while(POKE THE HARDWARE);
which obscures the potentially infinite
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 05:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 04:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
while(POKE THE
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:48 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 04:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 17:11 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 04:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 17:11 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/21/2014 04:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 16:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2014 10:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Mainly whitespace. The main construct which it complains about is:
13 matches
Mail list logo
