Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
---
Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
--->8---
virtual patch
@@
struct pwm_device *p;
expression e;
@@
(
-(p)->polarity = e;
+pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
|
-(p)->polarity
+pwm_get_polarity((p))
|
-(p)->period = e;
+pwm_set_period((p), e);
|
-(p)->period
+pwm_get_period((p))
|
-(p)->duty_cycle = e;
+pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
|
-(p)->duty_cycle
+pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
)
--->8---
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 2 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
index 7101c70..2f88543 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct
pwm_device *pwm,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (pwm->period != period_ns) {
+ if (pwm_get_period((pwm)) != period_ns) {
int clk_div;
/* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
index 9163085..091fa13 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
pwm_device *pwm)
LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event),
LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL);
- if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
+ if (pwm_get_polarity((pwm)) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
set_event = lpc18xx_pwm->period_event;
clear_event = lpc18xx_data->duty_event;
res_action = LPC18XX_PWM_RES_SET;
--
2.1.4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
