[linux-sunxi] Fwd: Re: [media-codec] media-codec / cedar released as LGPL, but where is the source? (#5)

2015-03-19 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Luc, Sunxi-community, It looks like they replaced a few function (names only) so the symbols don't show up with a simple grep (I cannot find ff_huff_build_tree for example). Can anybody confirm/deny that they went over a list of a few functions just to change the names/obfuscate things? The

Re: [linux-sunxi] Fwd: Re: [media-codec] media-codec / cedar released as LGPL, but where is the source? (#5)

2015-03-19 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: Luc, Sunxi-community, It looks like they replaced a few function (names only) so the symbols don't show up with a simple grep (I cannot find ff_huff_build_tree for example). Can anybody confirm/deny that they went over a

Re: [linux-sunxi] Fwd: Re: [media-codec] media-codec / cedar released as LGPL, but where is the source? (#5)

2015-03-19 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey, On 19-03-15 12:39, Luc Verhaegen wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: snip When Allwinner stated that they did CedarX2.0 about two months ago, they added _more_ lgpled code. But this time they tried to trivially disguise the code origins. This is a

Re: [linux-sunxi] Fwd: Re: [media-codec] media-codec / cedar released as LGPL, but where is the source? (#5)

2015-03-19 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:44:40PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: Hey, On 19-03-15 12:39, Luc Verhaegen wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: snip When Allwinner stated that they did CedarX2.0 about two months ago, they added _more_ lgpled code. But this