Salut,
On 02/02/16 18:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:27PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> clk_register_mux returns a pointer wrapped error value in case of
>> failure, so a simple NULL check is not sufficient to catch errors.
>> Fix that and elaborate on the failure reaso
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:27PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> clk_register_mux returns a pointer wrapped error value in case of
> failure, so a simple NULL check is not sufficient to catch errors.
> Fix that and elaborate on the failure reason on the way. The whole
> function does not return an