[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators

2015-09-22 Thread Lee Jones
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > >> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained > >> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names.

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators

2015-09-20 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
Hi Lee, On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained >> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the >> parent regulator names

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators

2015-09-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained > to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the > parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes > some confusion when

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators

2015-09-19 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained > to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the > parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes > some confusion when we actually use it in

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators

2015-09-16 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained > to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the > parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes > some confusion when