On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >
> >> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> >> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names.
Hi Lee,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
>> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
>> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
>> parent regulator names
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when we actually use it in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when