On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:27:14PM -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Henrik Nordström
>> wrote:
>> > tor 2014-08-14 klockan 08:07 -0400 skrev jonsm...@gmail.com:
>> >
>> >> So what are the rules going to be
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:27:14PM -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Henrik Nordström
> wrote:
> > tor 2014-08-14 klockan 08:07 -0400 skrev jonsm...@gmail.com:
> >
> >> So what are the rules going to be? Once the OS is up and starts
> >> changing things the state
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
> tor 2014-08-14 klockan 08:07 -0400 skrev jonsm...@gmail.com:
>
>> So what are the rules going to be? Once the OS is up and starts
>> changing things the state in the DT and the OS are going to diverge.
>> How does this get handled for a ke
tor 2014-08-14 klockan 08:07 -0400 skrev jonsm...@gmail.com:
> So what are the rules going to be? Once the OS is up and starts
> changing things the state in the DT and the OS are going to diverge.
> How does this get handled for a kernel driver that can load/unload?
> Should the kernel remove tho
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:41 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Luc Verhaege
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:41 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:45:24AM +0200, Luc Ver
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:45:24AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Grant Li
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:00:07PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> Both of which make sense and should be supported, so I agree we need
> to find a solution.
>
> The problem I think comes down to the handoff mechanism. There are a
> lot of different video controllers which could all be configured
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:58:36PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 01:25 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>>
>> The code that sets up simplefb for sunxi is primarily for providing a
>> console in u-boot (using the ancient cfbconsole infrastructure). From
>> what i can tell, the u-boot code for
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:14:37PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> BTW, Is anyone currently using the simple framebuffer for early
>> console? For early console we would want to start using it well before
>> setting up platform devices.
>
>
On 08/13/2014 01:25 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:14:37PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
BTW, Is anyone currently using the simple framebuffer for early
console? For early console we would want to start using it well before
setting up platform devices.
The code that sets up
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:14:37PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> BTW, Is anyone currently using the simple framebuffer for early
> console? For early console we would want to start using it well before
> setting up platform devices.
The code that sets up simplefb for sunxi is primarily for provi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:45:24AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The majority of the DT code is based o
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 11:26 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stephen Warren
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/13/2014 02:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Lik
On 08/13/2014 11:26 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/13/2014 02:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
The next commit will ha
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 02:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
The next commit will handle clocks correctly, so
On 08/13/2014 02:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
The next commit will handle clocks correctly, so that these do not get
automatically disabled on certain SoC simplefb implementations.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:45:24AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >
>> > The majority of the DT code is based on the assumption of a static
>> > tree. Pantelis has been working
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:45:24AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> > The majority of the DT code is based on the assumption of a static
> > tree. Pantelis has been working on being able to modify it at runtime
> > with overlays, but
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> The majority of the DT code is based on the assumption of a static
> tree. Pantelis has been working on being able to modify it at runtime
> with overlays, but he has had to go through a lot of rework because it
> is not a trivial t
Hi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>>> * the exception is an overlay driver which add new devices to the
>>> kernel. Definitely not the case here.
>>
>> Why
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>>> The next commit will handle clocks correctly, so that these do not get
>>> automatically disabled on certain SoC si
Hi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> The next commit will handle clocks correctly, so that these do not get
>> automatically disabled on certain SoC simplefb implementations. As a
>> result, the removal of this simple
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> The next commit will handle clocks correctly, so that these do not get
> automatically disabled on certain SoC simplefb implementations. As a
> result, the removal of this simplefb driver, and the release of the
> clocks, is rather final, and
24 matches
Mail list logo
