Hi,
On 10/05/2014 05:17 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/05/2014 05:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wro
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:29 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede w
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:29 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrot
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/05/2014 05:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
Hi,
On 10/05/2014 05:07 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrot
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
Hi,
On 10/05/2014 02:52 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 12:56 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2014 12:56 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 02:38 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/04/2014 12:56 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
Quoting jonsm...@gmail.com (2014-10-03 14:50:24)
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:55 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:34 PM, jonsm...@
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/04/2014 12:56 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 12:56 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> A simple
Hi,
On 10/03/2014 10:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmwar
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:55 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:34 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
Does the clock and regulator cleanup
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:55 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:34 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> Does the clock and regulator cleanup happen before drivers can load
>>> off from initrd? I didn't think i
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmwar
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
>>> bootloader. Such a framebuffer may have a number of
Hi,
On 10/03/2014 06:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setu
Hi,
On 10/03/2014 05:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
>> bootloader. Such a framebuffer may have a number of clocks in use, add a
>> property to communicate this to the OS
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
>>> bootloader. Such a framebuffer ma
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
>> bootloader. Such a framebuffer may have a number of clocks in use, add a
>> property to communicate t
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> A simple-framebuffer node represents a framebuffer setup by the firmware /
> bootloader. Such a framebuffer may have a number of clocks in use, add a
> property to communicate this to the OS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
> Reviewed-by: Mi
25 matches
Mail list logo