On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:55:33 -0800
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 05:55 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:10:40 +0900
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon
On 11/16/2015 05:55 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:10:40 +0900
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon pisze:
Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
Doing that will
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:10:40 +0900
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon pisze:
> > Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
> > Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to
W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon pisze:
> Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
> Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
> update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
> ---
> Patch