Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Cubietruck lockup with current sunxi 3.4

2014-03-10 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 10 March 2014 16:58, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > On 03/09/14 07:10, Kyle Bassett wrote: >> >> >>> Try increase .emr1 more than 0x4 . >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Do we know what is the difference between '.emr1=0' and other settings >> such >> as '.emr1=0x4'? > > We know extremely little on how the memory

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Cubietruck lockup with current sunxi 3.4

2014-03-10 Thread Olliver Schinagl
On 03/09/14 07:10, Kyle Bassett wrote: Try increase .emr1 more than 0x4 . Hi, Do we know what is the difference between '.emr1=0' and other settings such as '.emr1=0x4'? We know extremely little on how the memory controller really works. This setting moving over from a different platform ap

[linux-sunxi] Re: Cubietruck lockup with current sunxi 3.4

2014-03-09 Thread Kyle Bassett
> Try increase .emr1 more than 0x4 . Hi, Do we know what is the difference between '.emr1=0' and other settings such as '.emr1=0x4'? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[linux-sunxi] Re: Cubietruck lockup with current sunxi 3.4

2014-02-01 Thread nilsnuls0
суббота, 1 февраля 2014 г., 17:50:00 UTC+4 пользователь Michal Suchanek написал: > Hello, > > > > I booted CT with the latest sunxi u-boot (which has FAST_MBUS iirc), > > latest sunxi 3.4 kernel, let it run overnight and it locked up. > > > > So maybe the FAST_MBUS and what not is not all th