Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix symbol counting logic by looking at modules as well

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:41:44 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:31:26 -0700 > Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > Recent changes to count number of matching symbols when creating > > a kprobe event failed to take into account kernel modules. As such, it > >

Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix symbol counting logic by looking at modules as well

Hi, On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:31:26 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > Recent changes to count number of matching symbols when creating > a kprobe event failed to take into account kernel modules. As such, it > breaks kprobes on kernel module symbols, by assuming there is no match. > > Fix this my

Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix symbol counting logic by looking at modules as well

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:37:29 -0700 Song Liu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:31 PM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > Recent changes to count number of matching symbols when creating > > a kprobe event failed to take into account kernel modules. As such, it > > breaks kprobes on kernel module

Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix symbol counting logic by looking at modules as well

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:31 PM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Recent changes to count number of matching symbols when creating > a kprobe event failed to take into account kernel modules. As such, it > breaks kprobes on kernel module symbols, by assuming there is no match. > > Fix this my calling

[PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix symbol counting logic by looking at modules as well

Recent changes to count number of matching symbols when creating a kprobe event failed to take into account kernel modules. As such, it breaks kprobes on kernel module symbols, by assuming there is no match. Fix this my calling module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() in addition to