On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:10 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Jason Xing <kernelx...@tencent.com> > > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing > also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They > don't print those two addrs of skb/sk which already exist. > > They are probably forgotten by the original authors, so this time I > finish the work. Also, adding more trace about the socket/skb addr can > help us sometime even though the chance is minor. > > I don't consider it is a bug, thus I chose to target net-next tree.
Gentle ping...No rush. Just in case this simple patchset was lost for some reason. Thanks, Jason > > [1] > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAL+tcoAhvFhXdr1WQU8mv_6ZX5nOoNpbOLAB6=c+db-qxq1...@mail.gmail.com/ > > Jason Xing (2): > tcp: add tracing of skb/skaddr in tcp_event_sk_skb class > tcp: add tracing of skbaddr in tcp_event_skb class > > include/trace/events/tcp.h | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.37.3 >
