在 2024/10/24 22:06, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:04:07AM +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
>> This patch is the second part of a series to improve the selftest bench
>> of uprobe/uretprobe [0]. The lack of simulating 'stp fp, lr, [sp, #imm]'
>> signif
nstead of new UPROBE_SSTEP state.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240731214256.3588718-1-and...@kernel.org
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240727094405.1362496-1-liaocha...@huawei.com
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240815014629.2685155-1-liaocha...@huawei.com/
Liao Chang (2):
uprobes: Re
Since clearing a bit in thread_info is an atomic operation, the spinlock
is redundant and can be removed, reducing lock contention is good for
performance.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 --
1 file changed
rg
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240727094405.1362496-1-liaocha...@huawei.com
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 1 +
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 +---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
在 2024/10/22 1:18, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 3:43 AM Liao, Chang wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/10/12 3:34, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 7:05 PM Liao, Chang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Peter and Masami
>
在 2024/10/1 22:29, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> On 09/27, Liao Chang wrote:
>>
>> The uprobe handler allocates xol slot from xol_area and quickly release
>> it in the single-step handler. The atomic operations on the xol bitmap
>> and slot_count lead to expensive cache lin
Oleg,
My bad to take so long to reply. I have recently returned from a long vacation.
在 2024/9/28 1:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> On 09/27, Liao Chang wrote:
>>
>> +int recycle_utask_slot(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct xol_area *area)
>> +{
>> +
在 2024/10/10 18:52, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 07:11:14AM +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
>> v2->v1:
>> 1. Remove the simuation of STP and the related bits.
>> 2. Use arm64_skip_faulting_instruction for single-stepping or FEAT_BTI
>>scenario.
>>
在 2024/10/16 2:58, Catalin Marinas 写道:
> On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:11:14 +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
>> v2->v1:
>> 1. Remove the simuation of STP and the related bits.
>> 2. Use arm64_skip_faulting_instruction for single-stepping or FEAT_BTI
>>scenario.
>>
在 2024/10/12 3:34, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 7:05 PM Liao, Chang wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Peter and Masami
>>
>> I look forward to your inputs on these series. Andrii has proven they are
>> hepful for uprobe scalability.
>>
>> Than
ace scenario, then restore the definition without static keyword in
the original patch [1]. And rebasing patch to next-20240927.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912111550.1752115-1-liaocha...@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
kernel/trace/fgraph.c |
在 2024/9/28 8:17, Steven Rostedt 写道:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:15:50 +
> Liao Chang wrote:
>
>> This patch uses [first ... last] = value to initialize fgraph_array[].
>> And it declares all the callbacks in fgraph_stub as static, as they are
>> not called fr
m 1 to 0 when recycling slot from GC list.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZuwoUmqXrztp-Mzh@tassilo/
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 4 +
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 177 ++--
2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --gi
dubious.
Andi, I've just sent v2. Looking forward to your feedback. Thanks.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240927094549.3382916-1-liaocha...@huawei.com/
>
> -Andi
>
--
BR
Liao, Chang
rate "fix info leak" patch.
Do you mean to fill the entire page with CPU specific illegal instructions
in this patch?
>
> Oleg.
>
>
--
BR
Liao, Chang
在 2024/9/23 15:18, Will Deacon 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:57:14AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>> 在 2024/9/20 23:32, Catalin Marinas 写道:
>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>>>> 在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
>>>>
在 2024/9/22 22:09, Will Deacon 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 07:32:23PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 09/20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2024
if-body excution exclusive among the CPUs? If that's the case,
I guess the test_and_put_task_slot() is the equvialent to the race condition
check. test_and_put_task_slot() uses a compare and exchange operation on the
slot_ref of utask instance. Regardless of the work type being performed by
other CPU, it will always bail out unless the slot_ref has a value of one,
indicating the utask is free to access from local CPU.
>
> -Andi
>
>
--
BR
Liao, Chang
在 2024/9/20 23:32, Catalin Marinas 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
>>> On 09/19, Liao Chang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
>&g
在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> On 09/19, Liao Chang wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
>> @@ -17,12 +17,16 @@ void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned
>> long vaddr,
>>
在 2024/9/18 20:25, Andi Kleen 写道:
> Liao Chang writes:
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * xol_recycle_insn_slot - recycle a slot from the garbage collection list.
>> + */
>> +static int xol_recycle_insn_slot(struct xol_area *area)
>> +{
>> +struct uprobe_ta
( 1.093M/s/cpu)
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
index d49aef2657cd..5ee27509d6f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
+++ b
Hi, Peter and Masami
I look forward to your inputs on these series. Andrii has proven they are
hepful for uprobe scalability.
Thanks.
在 2024/9/15 23:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> Hi Liao,
>
> On 09/14, Liao, Chang wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Oleg
>>
>> Kindly ping.
>>
the
associated xol slot will be free.
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 4 +
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 173 ++--
2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.
Hi, Oleg
Kindly ping.
This series have been pending for a month. Is thre any issue I overlook?
Thanks.
在 2024/8/15 9:46, Liao Chang 写道:
> The profiling result of BPF selftest on ARM64 platform reveals the
> significant contention on the current->sighand->siglock is the
> scalabi
This patch uses [first ... last] = value to initialize fgraph_array[].
And it declares all the callbacks in fgraph_stub as static, as they are
not called from external code.
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 -
kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 54
在 2024/9/11 4:54, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 11:14 PM Liao Chang wrote:
>>
>> This patch is the second part of a series to improve the selftest bench
>> of uprobe/uretprobe [0]. The lack of simulating 'stp fp, lr, [sp, #imm]'
>>
Hi, Mark
在 2024/9/6 17:39, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>> Hi, Mark
>>
>> Would you like to discuss this patch further, or do you still believe
>> emulating
>> STP to push FP/LR into the stack in kernel is not
cpu to 0.714M/s/cpu).
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/caef4bzao4eg6hr2hzxypn+7uer4chs0r99zln02ezz5yruv...@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zr3RN4zxF5XPgjEB@J2N7QTR9R3/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240815014629.2685155-1-liaocha...@huawei.com/
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
arch
在 2024/9/6 17:39, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>> Hi, Mark
>>
>> Would you like to discuss this patch further, or do you still believe
>> emulating
>> STP to push FP/LR into the stack in kernel is not a good
在 2024/9/6 4:17, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 2:25 AM Liao, Chang wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/8/30 3:26, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:34 AM Liao, Chang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Mark
>>>>
&g
在 2024/9/7 1:46, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:39 AM Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
>>> Hi, Mark
>>>
>>> Would you like to discuss this patch further, or do you still believe
&g
addressed in a separate
patch.
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/caef4bzao4eg6hr2hzxypn+7uer4chs0r99zln02ezz5yruv...@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zr3RN4zxF5XPgjEB@J2N7QTR9R3/
CC: Andrii Nakryiko
CC: Mark Rutland
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
ll ; done' &
jobs=$(ps | grep 'do date' | head -n 2 | awk '{print $1}')
echo kgdbts=V1F1000 > /sys/module/kgdbts/parameters/kgdbts
sleep 10
kill -9 $jobs
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/zs3lnykxl5sg2...@j2n7qtr9r3.cambridge.arm.com/
Suggested-by: Mark R
在 2024/9/2 16:58, Mark Rutland 写道:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 06:41:41AM +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
>> v2->v1:
>> Fix a bug of releasing spinlock in kgdb_arch_exit().
>>
>> As suggested by Mark Rutland [0], this patch remove the linked list used
>> for breakpoi
35 matches
Mail list logo