On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:57:14AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> 在 2024/9/20 23:32, Catalin Marinas 写道:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> >> 在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> >>> On 09/19, Liao Chang wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c
> +
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 07:32:23PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 在 2024/9/19 22:18, Oleg Nesterov 写道:
> > > > On 09/19, Liao Chang wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel
gt;
> > +static __always_inline struct pt_regs *
> > +ftrace_partial_regs(const struct ftrace_regs *fregs, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + memcpy(regs->regs, fregs->regs, sizeof(u64) * 9);
> > + regs->sp = fregs->sp;
> > + regs->pc = fregs->pc;
> > + regs->regs[29] = fregs->fp;
> > + regs->regs[30] = fregs->lr;
> > + return regs;
> > +}
Ah, I guess this is where we pick up the lr that was set in patch 5.
Acked-by: Will Deacon
Will
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 04:49:20AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:09:02 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
> >
> > Pass ftrace_regs to the fgraph_ops::retfunc(). If ftrace_regs is not
> > available, it passes a NULL instead. U
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 05:11:44AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:08:51 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
> >
> > Use ftrace_regs instead of fgraph_ret_regs for tracing return value
> > on function_graph tracer because of sim
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 04:46:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Can I get an Acked-by from the AARCH64 maintainers for this patch?
Sorry, I wasn't CC'd on the thread, so I missed this.
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:08:40 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Goog
