From: Jason Xing
In production, there are so many cases about why the RST skb is sent but
we don't have a very convenient/fast method to detect the exact underlying
reasons.
RST is implemented in two kinds: passive kind (like tcp_v4_send_reset())
and active kind (like tcp_send_active_reset()). T
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:50 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:31:38 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > It's based on top of
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=840182
>
> Please post as RFC if there's a dependency.
> We don't maintain patch queues for people
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:31:38 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> It's based on top of
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=840182
Please post as RFC if there's a dependency.
We don't maintain patch queues for people.
--
pw-bot: cr
From: Jason Xing
In production, there are so many cases about why the RST skb is sent but
we don't have a very convenient/fast method to detect the exact underlying
reasons.
RST is implemented in two kinds: passive kind (like tcp_v4_send_reset())
and active kind (like tcp_send_active_reset()). T
