On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:15 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:08:01 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > - TP_PROTO(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb),
> > > + TP_PROTO(
> > > + const struct sock *sk,
> > > + const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > +
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:08:01 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > - TP_PROTO(const struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb),
> > + TP_PROTO(
> > + const struct sock *sk,
> > + const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + void *location),
>
> Very minor nit: the above lines
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 14:28 +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> In addition to knowing the 4-tuple of the flow which generates RST,
> the reason why it does so is very important because we have some
> cases where the RST should be sent and have no clue which one
> exactly.
>
>
From: Jason Xing
In addition to knowing the 4-tuple of the flow which generates RST,
the reason why it does so is very important because we have some
cases where the RST should be sent and have no clue which one
exactly.
Adding location of reset process can help us more, like what
