On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:21 PM Antoine Tenart wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-10 14:54:51)
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:14 PM Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-09 12:09:30)
> > > > void(*send_reset)(const struct sock
Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-10 14:54:51)
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:14 PM Antoine Tenart wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-09 12:09:30)
> > > void(*send_reset)(const struct sock *sk,
> > > - struct sk_buff *skb);
>
Hi Antoine,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:14 PM Antoine Tenart wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-09 12:09:30)
> > void(*send_reset)(const struct sock *sk,
> > - struct sk_buff *skb);
> > + struct sk_buff
Quoting Jason Xing (2024-04-09 12:09:30)
> void(*send_reset)(const struct sock *sk,
> - struct sk_buff *skb);
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + int reason);
I get that 'int'
From: Jason Xing
Adjust the parameter and support passing reason of reset which
is for now NOT_SPECIFIED. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing
---
include/net/request_sock.h | 3 ++-
net/dccp/ipv4.c| 10 ++
net/dccp/ipv6.c| 10 ++
