On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:59:09 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:00 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:09:09 -0700
> > Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > > Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
> > > that RCU is
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:00 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:09:09 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> > Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
> > that RCU is watching when trying to setup rethooko on a function entry.
> >
> > One notable
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:09:09 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
> that RCU is watching when trying to setup rethooko on a function entry.
>
> One notable exception when we force rcu_is_watching() check is
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
> that RCU is watching when trying to setup rethooko on a function entry.
>
> One notable exception when we force rcu_is_watching() check is
>
Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
that RCU is watching when trying to setup rethooko on a function entry.
One notable exception when we force rcu_is_watching() check is
CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE=y case, in which case kretprobes will use
old-style