Hello,
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 02:28:59PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:43:41AM +0200, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> > >
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 02:28:59PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:43:41AM +0200, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > in the context of a panic on an i.MX25 based v6.9 kernel [1] Uwe
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:43:41AM +0200, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in the context of a panic on an i.MX25 based v6.9 kernel [1] Uwe pointed me
> > to
> > this thread. With the proposed code change applied
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:43:41AM +0200, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in the context of a panic on an i.MX25 based v6.9 kernel [1] Uwe pointed me to
> this thread. With the proposed code change applied the procedure
>
> # set to some known good (randomly guessed) filter function and
Hello,
in the context of a panic on an i.MX25 based v6.9 kernel [1] Uwe pointed me to
this thread. With the proposed code change applied the procedure
# set to some known good (randomly guessed) filter function and enable
function_graph
echo mtdblock_open > set_ftrace_filter
echo fu
On 12/2/2023 1:26 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 09:49, Justin Chen wrote:
On 12/1/23 10:53 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 23:59, Justin Chen wrote:
On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
Justin Chen wrote:
I
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 09:49, Justin Chen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/1/23 10:53 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 23:59, Justin Chen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
> >>> Justin Chen wrote:
> >>>
> > It
On 12/1/23 10:53 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 23:59, Justin Chen wrote:
On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
Justin Chen wrote:
It appears the sub instruction at 0x6dd0 correctly accounts for the
extra 8 bytes, so the frame poi
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 23:59, Justin Chen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
> > Justin Chen wrote:
> >
> >>> It appears the sub instruction at 0x6dd0 correctly accounts for the
> >>> extra 8 bytes, so the frame pointer is valid. So it i
On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
Justin Chen wrote:
It appears the sub instruction at 0x6dd0 correctly accounts for the
extra 8 bytes, so the frame pointer is valid. So it is our assumption
that there are no gaps between the stack frames is invalid
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:12:48AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> It appears the sub instruction at 0x6dd0 correctly accounts for the
> extra 8 bytes, so the frame pointer is valid. So it is our assumption
> that there are no gaps between the stack frames is invalid.
>
> Could you try the followin
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:25:59 -0800
Justin Chen wrote:
> > It appears the sub instruction at 0x6dd0 correctly accounts for the
> > extra 8 bytes, so the frame pointer is valid. So it is our assumption
> > that there are no gaps between the stack frames is invalid.
>
> Thanks for the assistance.
On 12/1/2023 1:12 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 00:48, Justin Chen wrote:
Hello,
Ran into an odd bug that I am unsure what the solution is. Tested a few
kernels versions and they all fail the same.
FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST was enabled with 953f534a7ed6 ("ARM: ftrace:
enable
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 00:48, Justin Chen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Ran into an odd bug that I am unsure what the solution is. Tested a few
> kernels versions and they all fail the same.
>
> FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST was enabled with 953f534a7ed6 ("ARM: ftrace:
> enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST"). This
Hello,
Ran into an odd bug that I am unsure what the solution is. Tested a few
kernels versions and they all fail the same.
FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST was enabled with 953f534a7ed6 ("ARM: ftrace:
enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST"). This test fails when
UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER is enabled. Enable
15 matches
Mail list logo