On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:43:38AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t dwc3_otg_irq(int irq, void *_dwc)
> > +{
> > + struct dwc3 *dwc = _dwc;
> > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&dwc->lock);
>
> this seems unnecessary, we're
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:24:16PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Register with the USB OTG core. Since we don't support
> OTG yet we just work as a dual-role device even
> if device tree says "otg".
>
> +
> +static int dwc3_drd_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> +{
> + int ret, id, vbus;
> + struct
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:23:39AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Peter Chen wrote:
>
> > The bulk queue tests are used to show 'best performance' for bulk
> > transfer, we are often asked this question by users.
> >
> > It's result should be very close to IC simulation, in order
If a failure happens early in udc_pci_probe(), error handling code
just kfree(dev) and returns. The patch adds proper resource
deallocations in udc_pci_probe() itself,
since udc_pci_remove() is not suitabe to be called so early
in initialization process.
By the way, iounmap(dev->regs) is replaced
