rupt priority on the musb-controller with limited
success (it gets from the lower end of the bandwidth to the upper.)
Is there anything else I could try to mitigate this problem and improve
performance?
Best regards,
Frederik Schmid
Rubico AB
www.rubico.se
--
To unsubscribe from this
wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:44:05AM +0200, Frederik Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm developing a camera application on a TI OMAP4460. I have a cmos
> > usb-camera from IDS (UI-1551-LE-C-HQ) connected to the OTG-port (musb as
> > host) on the OMAP.
>
ode 1:
* It's basically usable only for mass storage class; essentially all
* other protocols also terminate transfers on short packets.
* ...
*/
Best regards,
Frederik
On Friday 10 May 2013 07.26.35 Frederik Schmid wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> The kernel is based on 3.4.11 from omap
Hi Ruslan,
Thanks for the tips! A few comments below:
On Friday 10 May 2013 13.54.53 Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hello Frederic,
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Frederik Schmid
>
> wrote:
> > Well, my conclusion is that this setup, IDS-camera + musb, is horribly
>
Ming,
The ehci controller is bogged down because the frames from the camera and
other stuff are being relayed over ethernet.
/Frederik
On Friday 10 May 2013 23.24.32 Ming Lei wrote:
>
> Why do you think it's bogged down with ethernet? The ethernet throughput
> can go beyond 90Mbps on Pandaboa
On Monday 13 May 2013 05.01.01 Greg KH wrote:
> Why do the two have any relation to each other, with the exception of
> possible CPU usage? Are they sharing an interrupt and that is somehow a
> problem?
They don't have any relation. The reason why we're trying to use the musb
controller is so th
On Monday 13 May 2013 05.44.22 Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:23:55PM +0200, Frederik Schmid wrote:
> > On Monday 13 May 2013 05.01.01 Greg KH wrote:
> > > Why do the two have any relation to each other, with the exception of
> > > possible CPU usage? Ar
On Monday 13 May 2013 20.46.40 Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Frederik Schmid
>
> wrote:
> > Ming,
> >
> > The ehci controller is bogged down because the frames from the camera and
> > other stuff are being relayed over ethernet.
>
>