ts/
p.s. Regarding quote[1] point "1.", after Paolo Abeni optimized the UDP
code, that statement is no longer true. It now (significantly) faster to
run/pin your UDP application to another CPU than the RX-CPU.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engine
ey use PREEMPT?
LibreELEC:~ # uname -a
Linux LibreELEC 4.14.10 #1 SMP Tue Jan 9 17:35:03 GMT 2018 armv7l GNU/Linux
[2]
https://forum.libreelec.tv/thread/4235-dvb-issue-since-le-switched-to-kernel-4-9-x/?postID=76999#post76999
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Princi
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 22:44:27 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:31:09PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > I did expected the issue to get worse, when you load the Pi with
> > network traffic, as now the softirq time-budget have to be shared
> > b
on or tshark on libreelec so I can't
> provide further logs.
Do you have perf or trace-cmd on the box? Maybe we could come up with
some kernel functions to trace, to measure/show the latency spikes?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
org:80/wiki/index.php/Lab_Setup
[4]
http://web.archive.org/web/20150328234459/http://www.iptv-analyzer.org:80/wiki/index.php/Multicast_Signal_on_Linux
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe fr
ng on the same CPU. But in some cases this is
not what you want, so as the also commit mentions, the admin can now
more easily tune process scheduling parameters if needed, to adjust for
such use-cases (it was not really an admin choice before).
> For example, we didn't hav
