On Thursday 30 January 2014 11:46 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Hi All,
I have some questions regarding below two methods in
drivers/usr/core/urb.c source code.
Methods:
void usb_kill_urb(struct urb *urb)
void usb_poison_urb(struct urb *urb)
In both
(&urb->use_count) == 0` before going to sleep.
Should we add the check before putting the calling process to sleep or
avoiding check is intended (please explain if yes).
Regards
Kumar Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body
ohci-pci driver. Is
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI enabled?
how did you identified it was using ohci?
Please reply.
Regards
Kumar Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sure sarah, Thanks
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 11:42:33AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Tuesday 03 September 2013 09:34 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
I'm confused. I said the last version of this patch didn't apply
against usb-next, and you should rebase it. Why did you put "No Chang
hange if there's
no change from previous patch, but he didn't meant in subject (my bad).
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:02:45PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
This patch redefine function xhci_readl. xhci_readl function doesn't use
xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of k
I tried applying this patch on linux-next and it applies well.
i used
git apply --apply
On Saturday 31 August 2013 11:02 PM, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
This patch redefine function xhci_readl. xhci_readl function doesn't use
xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of keeping it i
igned-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c | 36 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 72 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 20 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 12 +++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 10:31 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:39:06PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
I've started cloning linux-next and as it&
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use
xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments.
Redefining
d-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c | 36 +++
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 72 +++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 20 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 12 ++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |
d-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c | 36 +++
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 72 +++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 20 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 12 ++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |
Fixing other programs in xhci driver which calls this function
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c | 36 +++
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 72 +++---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 20 -
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:19 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:30 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:18:42AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Removed struct xhci_hcd from xhci_readl fucntion as it's no more i
On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:30 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:18:42AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Removed struct xhci_hcd from xhci_readl fucntion as it's no more in use.
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c | 36 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
index 5d5e58f..66dc1c0 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
@
On Saturday 17 August 2013 12:25 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:21:08AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 72 +--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
index 1d35459..c0198af 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 1e57eaf..9d4128c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ vo
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index df6978a..0a8aa3e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -2057,7 +2057,
Fixed xhci_readl call issue as per definition modified in patch
0019-drivers-usb-host-xhci.h-Removing-xhci_hcd-from-argum.patch
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 100 +++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff
Removed struct xhci_hcd from xhci_readl fucntion as it's no more in use.
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
index c338741..7cf0e41 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
+++ b/drivers/
On Friday 16 August 2013 11:57 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:34:58PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Friday 16 August 2013 11:28 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:09:12PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Hi Sarah,
I was just reading through xhci driver's cod
On Friday 16 August 2013 11:28 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:09:12PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Hi Sarah,
I was just reading through xhci driver's code and found something
which i'm unable to understand use of.
Please help me understanding them
1.use of struct x
ne unsigned int xhci_readl(const struct xhci_hcd
*xhci,__le32 __iomem *regs)
{
return readl(regs);
}
Regards
Kumar Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info a
drive is working right now and is on Bus 09).
Alex
On Tue 13 Aug 2013 02:23:50 AM EDT, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
I'm new to kernel development. I want to explore this bug. From you
dmesg output I'm unable to get the driver your device is using. can
you tell me which driver are
Hi Alexandre,
I'm new to kernel development. I want to explore this bug. From you
dmesg output I'm unable to get the driver your device is using. can you
tell me which driver are you using?
regards
Kumar Gaurav
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 11:15 AM, Alexandre Demers wrote:
Sorry
the macro is
using.
2013/8/1 Julia Lawall mailto:julia.law...@lip6.fr>>
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> Fixed String splitted into multiple line issue using macro
I'm not an expert on this kind of style issue, but I prefer
strings that
loo
Fixed String splitted into multiple line issue using macro
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav
---
drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/stub_dev.c
index 83d629a
28 matches
Mail list logo
