Re: [PATCH] scatterlist.h: Change CONFIG_DEBUG_SG for ifdef statement in sg_set_bf

2014-08-02 Thread Mateusz Guzik
d compiling this? IIRC you said you would compile your stuff, what hapened to that? What exactly were you trying to achieve? Did this BUG_ON detect a problem on your system and now you are trying to silence it? The change would be wrong even if it compiled since it would just execute the ass

Re: [PATCH] scatterlist.h: Change CONFIG_DEBUG_SG for ifdef statement in sg_set_bf

2014-08-02 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 12:31:30AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:56:13PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote: > >> This changes the ifdef statement in sg_set_bg to !CONFIG_DEBUG_SG in order > >&g

Re: [PATCH] scatterlist.h: Change CONFIG_DEBUG_SG for ifdef statement in sg_set_bf

2014-08-03 Thread Mateusz Guzik
give you a chance to improve. Example programs you can write for fun: - a tcp proxy using poll, epoll and select. backend can be chosen at startup. implement everything yourself, do not use wrappers - a simple shell supporting output redirection and pipes - pick your favourite utility from and imple

Re: [PATCH] xhci: Merge and Update debugging for patches from 3.6 kernel tree

2014-08-05 Thread Mateusz Guzik
ing a working patch is. Forward porting, like this one, demands that you: - understand the patch as applied to the original tree - understand current state of the tree and how it influences the patch As such, foward porting is typically not a task for beginners. I can only recommend one last time yo