On 15.11.2017 11:46, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
On 23.10.2017 12:37, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
In our latest ARM64-based CPU, we
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Mathias Nyman
> wrote:
>> On 23.10.2017 12:37, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> In our latest ARM64-based CPU, we use the DesignWare USB which
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> On 23.10.2017 12:37, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> In our latest ARM64-based CPU, we use the DesignWare USB which is
>> xHCI-compatible. For some reasons, we disable USB3.0 support so remove the
>>
On 23.10.2017 12:37, Thang Q. Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
In our latest ARM64-based CPU, we use the DesignWare USB which is
xHCI-compatible. For some reasons, we disable USB3.0 support so remove the
unnecessary USB3.0 capability structure information as specified in the
xHCI specification 1.1, section
Hi,
In our latest ARM64-based CPU, we use the DesignWare USB which is
xHCI-compatible. For some reasons, we disable USB3.0 support so remove the
unnecessary USB3.0 capability structure information as specified in the
xHCI specification 1.1, section 7.2:
"At least one of these capability structures