On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Notice that I have a patch in the USB queue which fixes up the MPC834x
> symbol (PPC_MPC834x instead of MPC834x) so this patch won't apply.
Never mind, Greg fixed it.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
-
To unsubscribe from th
> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Anton> config USB_EHCI_FSL
Anton> - bool
Anton> - depends on USB_EHCI_HCD
Anton> + bool "Support for Freescale on-chip EHCI USB controller"
Anton> + depends on USB_EHCI_HCD && FSL_SOC
Anton> se
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:58:18PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >Without this patch it's impossible to select ehci-fsl on PPC_MPC837x.
> >Another option would be to convert USB_EHCI_FSL to verbose bool,
> >but I presume EHCI_FSL is purposely
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Without this patch it's impossible to select ehci-fsl on PPC_MPC837x.
Another option would be to convert USB_EHCI_FSL to verbose bool,
but I presume EHCI_FSL is purposely made silent.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL P
On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Without this patch it's impossible to select ehci-fsl on PPC_MPC837x.
Another option would be to convert USB_EHCI_FSL to verbose bool,
but I presume EHCI_FSL is purposely made silent.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
dri
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Without this patch it's impossible to select ehci-fsl on PPC_MPC837x.
Another option would be to convert USB_EHCI_FSL to verbose bool,
but I presume EHCI_FSL is purposely made silent.
I think making it verbose bool would be better.
-Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Without this patch it's impossible to select ehci-fsl on PPC_MPC837x.
Another option would be to convert USB_EHCI_FSL to verbose bool,
but I presume EHCI_FSL is purposely made silent.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/usb/host/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 ins
