On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:39:56AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Don't include the Subject: in the patch body again, that is pointless
and requires me to hand-edit the file.
Because
This patch is corrupted and can not be applied at all. Please fix your email
client and try again.
greg k-h
I am very sorry to waste your time, resend it again.
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Why is this in the patch?
Please resend it in a format that I do not have to manually edit the patch.
greg k-h
Thanks your teaching, resend again.
Because the IRQF_DISABLED
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
so
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
so in usb/host code:
Removing the usage of flag
