The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
but in dwc2_update_isoc_urb_state(), it just updates
the actual_length of isoc frame, and don't update the
urb actual_length at the same time, this will cause
device drivers working error which
Hi,
On 11/6/2017 12:46 PM, William Wu wrote:
> The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
> to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
> but in dwc2_update_isoc_urb_state(), it just updates
> the actual_length of isoc frame, and don't update the
> urb actual_length at the same
Hi Minas,
在 2017年11月06日 17:28, Minas Harutyunyan 写道:
Hi,
On 11/6/2017 12:46 PM, William Wu wrote:
The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
but in dwc2_update_isoc_urb_state(), it just updates
the actual_length of isoc frame, and
Hi William,
On 11/6/2017 2:08 PM, wlf wrote:
> Hi Minas,
>
> 在 2017年11月06日 17:28, Minas Harutyunyan 写道:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/6/2017 12:46 PM, William Wu wrote:
>>> The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
>>> to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
>>> but in dwc2_update_is
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, wlf wrote:
> Hi Minas,
>
> 在 2017年11月06日 17:28, Minas Harutyunyan 写道:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 11/6/2017 12:46 PM, William Wu wrote:
> >> The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
> >> to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
> >> but in dwc2_update_isoc_urb_s
Hi Alan,
在 2017年11月07日 03:17, Alan Stern 写道:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, wlf wrote:
Hi Minas,
在 2017年11月06日 17:28, Minas Harutyunyan 写道:
Hi,
On 11/6/2017 12:46 PM, William Wu wrote:
The actual_length in dwc2_hcd_urb structure is used
to indicate the total data length transferred so far,
but in dwc
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, wlf wrote:
> > That sounds like a good idea. Minas, does the following patch fix your
> > problem?
> >
> > In theory we could do this calculation for every isochronous URB, not
> > just those coming from usbfs. But I don't think there's any point,
> > since the USB class dri
Hi Alan,
在 2017年11月07日 23:18, Alan Stern 写道:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, wlf wrote:
That sounds like a good idea. Minas, does the following patch fix your
problem?
In theory we could do this calculation for every isochronous URB, not
just those coming from usbfs. But I don't think there's any point