On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 12:39:51PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:47:26AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:29:51PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > Some SoC's FPGA platform will need this quirk, but it will complain if
> > > running at true SoC platform.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:47:26AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:29:51PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > Some SoC's FPGA platform will need this quirk, but it will complain if
> > running at true SoC platform. This is a normal case, so remove this
> > warning.
>
> nope, why d
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:29:51PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> Some SoC's FPGA platform will need this quirk, but it will complain if
> running at true SoC platform. This is a normal case, so remove this
> warning.
nope, why do you need disable_scramble on actual SoC ? Without an
erratum number I wi
Some SoC's FPGA platform will need this quirk, but it will complain if
running at true SoC platform. This is a normal case, so remove this
warning.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
Hi,
This patch is based on balbi/testing/next branch.
Thanks,
Rui
---
drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 ---
1 file chang
