On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> do not try to set cancel function in synchronous operations in
> ffs_epfile_{read,write}_iter.
>
> With, 70e60d917 gadget/function/f_fs.c: switch to ->{read,write}_iter()
> if CONFIG_AIO is disable there is no problem as kiocb_set
do not try to set cancel function in synchronous operations in
ffs_epfile_{read,write}_iter.
With, 70e60d917 gadget/function/f_fs.c: switch to ->{read,write}_iter()
if CONFIG_AIO is disable there is no problem as kiocb_set_cancel_fn
is a nop, with this option enabled it will try to use ctx that is
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:02:07PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> do not try to set cancel function in synchronous operations in
> ffs_epfile_{read,write}_iter.
why not ? Please provide a better commit log and Cc author of the commit
which added that particular line.
> Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel
