On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hmm, looks like there's no easy way out. Can we (easily) make
> a compatibility layer between the two ? What are the biggest
> differences ?
Come to think of it, would it make sense to make it as a user space
library preloaded when gadgetfs user space app
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:27:49PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > the benefit is that we will be able to go ahed with configfs-based
> > binding and will be able to drop duplicated gadget code between legacy
> > (non-composite) and composite fram
On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> the benefit is that we will be able to go ahed with configfs-based
> binding and will be able to drop duplicated gadget code between legacy
> (non-composite) and composite framework with the function drivers.
I'm not sure whether keeping gadgetfs around i
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 07:16:39PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hmm, looks like there's no easy way out. Can we (easily) make
> > a compatibility layer between the two ? What are the biggest
> > differences?
>
> The biggest difference is that
On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hmm, looks like there's no easy way out. Can we (easily) make
> a compatibility layer between the two ? What are the biggest
> differences?
The biggest difference is that gadgetfs application handles all setup
requests whereas with functionfs most of them
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:28:19PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> > gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all
> > that easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does?
>
> gadgetfs and functionfs have a different API so f_
On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all
> that easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does?
gadgetfs and functionfs have a different API so f_fs cannot be used as
a drop-in replacement for gadgetfs.
--
Best regards,
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:55:45AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > > > gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all
> > > > > that
> > > > > easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does?
> > > >
> > > > yes, just a di
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all that
> > > > easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does?
> > >
> > > yes, just a different name (functionfs instead of gadgetfs).
> >
> > No. gadgetfs supports async I/O
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:38AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > it's not used anymore by anyone, we can
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:33:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:25:56PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:25:56PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > it's not used anymo
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > it's not used anymore by anyone, we can remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > it's not used anymore by anyone, we can remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
>
> my bad, we still have gadgetfs.
I was going to ask you about that
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> it's not used anymore by anyone, we can remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
my bad, we still have gadgetfs.
In any case, everybody agrees about removing gadgetfs and using f_fs
only ?
--
balbi
signature.asc
Descript
it's not used anymore by anyone, we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi
---
drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c | 2129
1 file changed, 2129 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c b/drivers/u
17 matches
Mail list logo
