[PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2013-09-18 Thread Ramneek Mehresh
As per USB specification, in Suspend state the status bit does not change until the port is suspended. However, there may be a delay in suspending a port if there is a transaction currently in progress on the bus. In the USBDR controller, the PORTSCx[SUSP] bit changes immediately when the applicat

[PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-24 Thread Changming Huang
As per USB specification, in the Suspend state, the status bit does not change until the port is suspended. However, there may be a delay in suspending a port if there is a transaction currently in progress on the bus. In the USBDR controller, the PORTSCx[SUSP] bit changes immediately when the app

Re: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2013-09-19 Thread Daniele Forsi
2013/9/19 Ramneek Mehresh: > + * we need to wait for 10ms for bus to fo into suspend mode after there's a typo: s/fo/go/ -- Daniele Forsi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://

Re: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2013-09-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Ramneek Mehresh wrote: > As per USB specification, in Suspend state the status bit does > not change until the port is suspended. However, there may be a delay > in suspending a port if there is a transaction currently in progress > on the bus. > > In the USBDR controller, th

RE: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2013-09-19 Thread Mehresh Ramneek-B31383
-Original Message- From: Alan Stern [mailto:st...@rowland.harvard.edu] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 7:03 PM To: Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Ramneek Mehresh wrote: >

RE: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2013-09-23 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 wrote: > From: Alan Stern [mailto:st...@rowland.harvard.edu] > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 7:03 PM > To: Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 > Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH]fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 >

RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-24 Thread Sriram Dash
>From: Changming Huang [mailto:jerry.hu...@nxp.com] >As per USB specification, in the Suspend state, the status bit does not change >until >the port is suspended. However, there may be a delay in suspending a port if >there >is a transaction currently in progress on the bus. > >In the USBDR contr

RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Sriram Dash wrote: > >From: Changming Huang [mailto:jerry.hu...@nxp.com] > >As per USB specification, in the Suspend state, the status bit does not > >change until > >the port is suspended. However, there may be a delay in suspending a port if > >there > >is a transaction cu

RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-25 Thread Jerry Huang
...@vger.kernel.org; julia.law...@lip6.fr; Jerry Huang ; Ramneek Mehresh ; Suresh Gupta Subject: RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 >From: Changming Huang [mailto:jerry.hu...@nxp.com] As per USB >specification, in the Suspend state, the status bit does not change >

RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-25 Thread Jerry Huang
Mehresh ; Suresh Gupta Subject: RE: [PATCH] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Sriram Dash wrote: > >From: Changming Huang [mailto:jerry.hu...@nxp.com] As per USB > >specification, in the Suspend state, the status bit does not change > >until the