Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-07-02 Thread Johan Hovold
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:22:01AM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > In a message of Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:23:33 +0200, Johan Hovold writes: > >> I did a quick check of adding the device id though sysfs, and although > >> it partly works, it doesn't find the correct firmware (it ends up trying > >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-07-01 Thread Anders Hammarquist
In a message of Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:23:33 +0200, Johan Hovold writes: >> I did a quick check of adding the device id though sysfs, and although >> it partly works, it doesn't find the correct firmware (it ends up trying >> to load 5052 firmware for a 3410 device. Looking at the code it seems >> (st

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-28 Thread Johan Hovold
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:52PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > In a message of Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:39:24 +0200, Johan Hovold writes: > >On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:29:59AM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > >> In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:39:11 -0700, Greg KH writes: > >> >> Indeed. I'

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-27 Thread Anders Hammarquist
In a message of Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:39:24 +0200, Johan Hovold writes: >On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:29:59AM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: >> In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:39:11 -0700, Greg KH writes: >> >> Indeed. I'd already had some (failed) thoughts about how to handle it >> >> nicely. No

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-26 Thread Johan Hovold
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:29:59AM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:39:11 -0700, Greg KH writes: > >> Indeed. I'd already had some (failed) thoughts about how to handle it > >> nicely. Now I've had another think through, and I have something which > >> deals wi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-26 Thread Anders Hammarquist
In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:39:11 -0700, Greg KH writes: >> Indeed. I'd already had some (failed) thoughts about how to handle it >> nicely. Now I've had another think through, and I have something which >> deals with it and at least complains if TI_EXTRA_VID_PID_COUNT is changed >> without

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-25 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote: > In a message of Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:56:03 -0700, Greg KH writes: > >Please resend this in a format that I can apply it in (i.e. one that > >does not require me to edit it by hand...) > > After more fighting with git, I belive I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2013-06-22 Thread Anders Hammarquist
In a message of Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:56:03 -0700, Greg KH writes: >Please resend this in a format that I can apply it in (i.e. one that >does not require me to edit it by hand...) After more fighting with git, I belive I now made it spit out what I wanted. Patch 1/2 ahead. >> -static struct usb_de