Hi Lee,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2016, 10:24 +0100 schrieb Lee Jones:
[...]
> I guess it should really go into the -rcs, yes. Since Hans' patch
> actually breaks a lot of devices. I'm pretty surprised a patch
> capable of this much damage was actually accepted to be honest.
I wasn't aware there
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Phasing out generic reset line requests enables us to make some better
> > > decisions on when and how to (de)assert said lines. If an
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Phasing out generic reset line requests enables us to make some better
> > decisions on when and how to (de)assert said lines. If an 'exclusive'
> > line is requested, we know a device *requires* a
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> Phasing out generic reset line requests enables us to make some better
> decisions on when and how to (de)assert said lines. If an 'exclusive'
> line is requested, we know a device *requires* a reset and that it's
> preferable to act upon a request
Phasing out generic reset line requests enables us to make some better
decisions on when and how to (de)assert said lines. If an 'exclusive'
line is requested, we know a device *requires* a reset and that it's
preferable to act upon a request right away. However, if a 'shared'
reset line is
