On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:48:25PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48:32AM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The now reverted mxu11x0 turned out to be a copy of ti_usb_3410_5052 driver.
> > This aim of this serie is to apply all of the cleanups we did in mxu11x
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48:32AM +0200, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The now reverted mxu11x0 turned out to be a copy of ti_usb_3410_5052 driver.
> This aim of this serie is to apply all of the cleanups we did in mxu11x0 to
> ti_usb_3410_5052.
I apologise for the late review of this one. I
Hi,
The now reverted mxu11x0 turned out to be a copy of ti_usb_3410_5052 driver.
This aim of this serie is to apply all of the cleanups we did in mxu11x0 to
ti_usb_3410_5052.
Thank you,
Mathieu
Mathieu OTHACEHE (36):
usb: serial: ti_usb_3410_5052: Remove useless comments
usb: serial: ti_usb