Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Missing dma_mask in uhci-platform.c when probed from device-tree

2012-10-07 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 07-10-2012 3:09, Tony Prisk wrote: Device-tree probed devices don't get a dev.dma_mask set. This patch sets a default 32bit mask on platforms using devicetree. Without this patch, arch-vt8500 cannot detect uhci attached devices. Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk --- drivers/usb/host/uhci-

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Missing dma_mask in uhci-platform.c when probed from device-tree

2012-10-07 Thread Tony Prisk
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 11:41 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > > > Device-tree probed devices don't get a dev.dma_mask set. This patch > > sets a default 32bit mask on platforms using devicetree. > > > > Without this patch, arch-vt8500 cannot detect uhci attached d

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Missing dma_mask in uhci-platform.c when probed from device-tree

2012-10-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Device-tree probed devices don't get a dev.dma_mask set. This patch > sets a default 32bit mask on platforms using devicetree. > > Without this patch, arch-vt8500 cannot detect uhci attached devices. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk This patch has a small p

[PATCH 1/2] usb: Missing dma_mask in uhci-platform.c when probed from device-tree

2012-10-06 Thread Tony Prisk
Device-tree probed devices don't get a dev.dma_mask set. This patch sets a default 32bit mask on platforms using devicetree. Without this patch, arch-vt8500 cannot detect uhci attached devices. Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk --- drivers/usb/host/uhci-platform.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10